A Reporter Reports A Scandal Happening Within Gender Clinics, Critics Cry "Insurance Fraud"

The Desperation Is Palpable

Imagine if there existed a field of medicine advocating for "medically necessary" and "lifesaving" lobotomizations for individuals who identify as needing them. We are assured that not just anyone can request a lobotomy without rigorous evaluations to ensure its necessity. However, to test these claims, someone contacts the lobotomy clinic, stating, "I identify as needing a lobotomy." Remarkably, the clinic's "specialists" don't question the assertion, explicitly stating they won't act as "gatekeepers" for lobotomizations.

Virtual meetings serve as mere formalities, offering no real barrier to prevent the procedure. This revelation exposes the inadequacy of claimed medical safeguards. Now, imagine documenting this scandal in a detailed exposé, uncovering how anyone expressing a desire for a lobotomy can undergo the procedure, with critics only accusing the exposé writer of insurance fraud for not genuinely desiring it.

Yet, the exposé's core aim is to unveil the clinic's practice of indiscriminate lobotomizations under the guise of "medically necessary" treatment, deceiving health insurance providers. This parallels the situation in gender clinics operating under the guise of "gender-affirming care," surpassing the hypothetical lobotomy clinic in absurdity. Such clinics operate with a similar lack of thorough evaluation, enabling individuals to undergo irreversible procedures without genuine medical necessity.

Beth Bourne is a woman and a mother who claimed a “non-binary” identity to see how easy it would be to obtain cross-sex hormones and surgeries.

And, apparently, it’s a little too easy.

It's important to note that Beth didn't assert being suicidal or experiencing significant suffering. Her identification as "non-binary" stemmed from her dislike of wearing dresses, while her desire for a mastectomy and testosterone was fueled by a wish to feel stronger and avoid the perception of being an "apple-shaped older woman."

Beth's rationale for seeking a hysterectomy and phalloplasty boiled down to her personal desire for these procedures. There was no elaborate medical condition she claimed to have, as a diagnosis wasn't a prerequisite for accessing hormones and surgeries. The sole requirements for receiving testosterone, a double mastectomy, and a hysterectomy plus phalloplasty were simply a wish to undergo them and a nominal copay.

In this context, the only individuals engaging in insurance fraud are the self-proclaimed "gender specialists" who facilitate cosmetic surgeries on an à la carte basis, deceitfully presenting them to insurance providers as "medically necessary" and "lifesaving" procedures.

In reality, they are not.

Moreover, if Beth's claims align with medical standards for self-identifying as "non-binary," then the line between her purported "pretense" and genuine "non-binary" identification becomes blurred.

"Non-binary" falls under the umbrella of self-identification terminology.

As for Beth’s critics, as is typical of troons and their acolytes, they will engage in all sorts of distortion and obfuscation tactics in order to spin what would otherwise be an obvious truth into a blatant falsehood and their criticism of the experiment Beth constructed is entirely superficial.