I should give the good news right off the bat: this person has been given a total of 4 years and 3 months in prison, with a 4 years and 4 months Sexual Harm Prevention Order and Sex Offender Notification Requirements for life.
And now for the bad news:
The BBC is reporting this as 'Predatory' woman who incited man to abuse child, 4, jailed.
Dear Readers, this sub-human specimen is “Naomi” O’Brien and, in a moment, you’re about to see why I have given “Naomi” here the Skeptic’s Veto.
His actual name is Nathan and, according to a Daily Mail article from 2015, he’s an aspiring model who once competed in a Miss Transgender UK pageant.
The BBC has the unmitigated gall to call Nathan here a “predatory woman” - but this is the BBC, so we fully expect them to say awful shit like this.
Oh, before I go any further, I’d like to take this opportunity to remind you all of what the BBC really thinks of its audience…
Sometime in March 2023, Nathan “convinced” another man named Jonathan Walker to sexually abuse a 4-year-old child. Again, the quotes around “convinced” indicate my deep skepticism that Mr. Walker needed any convincing at all.
In for a penny, in for a pound as the Brits would say, because believe me when I tell you that Johnny-boy didn’t really need any convincing to rape a 4-year-old: he was going to anyway, except he found someone who told him it was okay to and acted on it.
And that someone who told him it was okay was Nathan “Naomi” O’Brien.
To be precise, what the Greater Manchester Police described as "tenacious and lengthy investigation of 1,865 messages" which proved her conversations with the man were "not simply a case of role play or fantasy".
According to Det Insp Zoe Marsden, of GMP's Online Child Abuse Investigation Team, O'Brien knew Walker had "an interest in sexually abusing a young boy on the direction of her [sic].”
O’Brien pleaded guilty to three counts of intentionally encouraging and assisting another to commit a sexual assault against a child, two counts of intentionally encouraging and assisting another to engage in sexual activity in the presence of a child and engaging in sexual activity in the presence of a child and was sentenced in November of this year.
Again, this is tedious and depressingly familiar as the BBC, once again, has abdicated any journalistic integrity to call a spade a spade.
This is also the same BBC that refuses to call Hamas a terrorist organization but had no problem pronouncing the Irish Republic Army terrorists.
This is really an irresponsible abdication of the truth by the BBC as the UK doesn’t have Self-ID and for this to be recorded as a crime committed by a woman is unacceptable.
I have to ask: on what planet do they refer to this criminal as a woman just because it's his preference?
Oh, and just in case it’s not very clear as to what the BBC actually thinks of its audience…
They hate you, my British peeps. Perhaps it’s time to stop paying your television license?
.