I'd Rather Be Rude Than A Fucking Liar

I'm Done Being Kind To The Most Blinkered Ideology In History, But You Already Knew That

We Are Supposed To Say This Is A Woman Under Penalty Of Law, If The TRAs Get Their Way

Today is July 1st, the first day after Pride Month.

I’m honestly relieved that Pride Month is over. Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for equality and people living their truths, but the constant bombardment of rainbows everywhere gets a bit much after a while. Every store, every ad, every social media post was a non-stop parade of Pride-themed content. It felt like a never-ending loop of the same messages, and it can get overwhelming.

It’s also exhausting trying to keep up with all the events and activities that pop up during Pride Month. There’s always a new march, a new rally, or some kind of celebration happening every weekend. It’s great for those who have the energy and time to participate in everything, but for me, it’s just too much. I found myself needing a break from the festivities just to catch my breath and get back to my routine.

So yesterday, Jasmine Benoit led the Pride London parade, and she’s this self-styled asexual who’s pushing for asexuality to get legal protection. I mean, come on, it’s a bit ridiculous to venerate something like that. It’s one thing to attempt to respect people’s personal experiences and choices, but claiming that asexuality is a sexual orientation that needs legal protection feels like a stretch that even Reed Richards would balk at.

Doesn’t Look Very Asexual To Me

Look, everyone has their preferences and ways they live their lives, and that’s mostly fine. But asexuality just means you’re not interested in sex, right? It’s not like being discriminated against for your sexual orientation, where there’s a history of real, tangible oppression and harm. It feels like we’re diluting the serious issues others face by putting asexuality on the same level.

Seeing her lead the parade and getting all this attention for it makes you wonder where we’re drawing the line. Are we just going to keep adding more and more categories until everyone feels included, regardless of whether it makes sense or not? It seems like we’re getting a bit carried away with trying to label every single personal preference as something that needs to be legally protected. It’s important to stay focused on the real battles that still need fighting and not get distracted by things that don’t quite fit the bill.

Jasmine Benoit is really grifting with this whole asexuality issue. Leading Pride London and pushing for legal protection for asexuality? It feels like she’s just riding the wave of attention to get her name out there. There are genuine struggles and battles for rights in the gay and lesbian community, but making a big deal about asexuality feels like she’s just trying to carve out a niche for herself.

I mean, let’s be real—she’s not facing the same kind of discrimination or hurdles that others in the community have to deal with. There’s no systemic oppression against asexual people. By putting herself at the forefront and demanding legal protection, it seems like she’s just trying to stay relevant and capitalize on the current social climate. It’s like she’s found a way to make herself a spokesperson for a non-issue.

It’s frustrating to see this kind of thing happen because it takes away from the real issues that need attention. There are still so many fights for equality and justice that are far from over. By focusing on something like asexuality and giving it this much spotlight, she’s diverting resources and energy from causes that genuinely need support. It’s a classic grift—finding a way to make a profit or gain fame from something that doesn’t really deserve it.

But I digress.

Transwomen - or men in dresses - who claim to be the most oppressed people on earth are nothing but a bunch of fucking bullshitters (but I repeat myself). They are not only trying to push their ideology onto everyone else, but they're also on a mission to normalize their sexual fetishes and if we don't play along, we could find ourselves in employment and even legal jeopardy. These men are using their gender identity to gain attention and sympathy from others in order to further their agenda. They're not truly oppressed but rather they are trying to push their ideology onto everyone else which is nothing more than a sick and twisted form of manipulation. Don't be fooled by these charlatans, they are just another group of people who have chosen their lifestyle for selfish reasons.

Transwomen are not women at all. They're just men who have undergone surgery, but only about 10% of them actually go through with it. The rest rely on cross-dressing and makeup to appear feminine.

And a trans child isn't a real concept. They're just a child. The idea of being trans is pushed by Big Pharma, targeting vulnerable, young, confused, and marginalized individuals. This medicalized model ensures a continuous flow of profit. Children caught in this system are harmed by doctors and staff who should know better but instead choose to support this ideology under the guise of helping them live their true selves.

David Tennant transing his 11-year old son is imposing an adult's ideology on a young, impressionable mind. Children are still developing and exploring their identities, and it seems irresponsible to make such significant, irreversible decisions for someone at such a young age. It’s important to allow kids the freedom to grow and understand themselves without the pressure of conforming to a particular narrative or agenda. Making life-altering choices based on current trends or personal beliefs can have long-term consequences that the child may not fully comprehend yet.

Yes, David, You Are A Shit Weak Parent - And An Asshole

I’m done with the most blinkered ideology in history. Being kind isn't about blindly accepting ideas that could harm vulnerable kids. It's about being honest and looking out for their well-being. Embracing unproven concepts under the guise of kindness only confuses things and could lead to real harm. We've got to question and challenge these ideas instead of just nodding along. Standing up for what's right means speaking up for truth and making sure we're not letting future generations get caught up in ideas that might do more harm than good.

And I won't just fall back on "be kind": it’s a thought-terminating cliché . It's important to think critically and act responsibly, especially when it comes to ideologies that could potentially harm vulnerable individuals, like children. We need to engage in honest discussions and consider the real implications of our actions, rather than using simplistic phrases to avoid deeper examination. Standing up for what's right involves more than just being nice; it means actively protecting those who might be affected by horribly misguided beliefs or practices.